{"id":15730,"date":"2023-11-12T11:42:11","date_gmt":"2023-11-12T16:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/?p=15730"},"modified":"2023-11-19T11:45:17","modified_gmt":"2023-11-19T16:45:17","slug":"liberals-carbon-tax-is-an-oppressive-ineffectual-tax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/?p=15730","title":{"rendered":"Liberals\u2019 carbon tax is an oppressive, ineffectual tax"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>The Niagara Independent, November 10, 2023 \u2013<\/em> If anything, the events of the past two weeks have revealed the Liberals\u2019 carbon tax is a political ploy and not a tool to fight climate change as they claim it is. The carbon tax is simply another tax on Canadians, not \u201ca price on pollution.\u201d And this tax is hurting Canadian individuals and families \u2013 and the nation\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n<p>It is a tax on everything. Today, the carbon tax adds more than $10 on every fill up and hundreds of dollars for home heating fuel through the winter. In the next six years, the scheduled tax hikes will more than double these totals. It is a tax on all goods and services. It hits farmers and truckers hard and hits commuters to work \u2013 twice a day. It increases the prices on everything from a Tim Horton\u2019s coffee and food in your grocery cart to housing construction costs. It is fueling the country\u2019s inflation rate, as confirmed recently by bank governor Tiff Macklen in public statements and before a MP parliamentary committee.<\/p>\n<p>Two weeks ago, while campaigning in the Maritimes, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made a surprise announcement that the government would pause charging the carbon tax on home heating oil, an initiative that directly benefits Atlantic residents. It was a crass political announcement that had the PM referencing the \u201chardworking Atlantic Liberal MPs\u201d who argued for relief from the federal carbon tax because they were pushing the cost of living beyond what Maritimers could bear.<\/p>\n<p>A political slugfest broke out between federal Liberal ministers and the provinces. Several premiers called on the federal government to eliminate the carbon tax on all forms of home heating. Ontario Premier Doug Ford published open letter to the Liberal federal caucus, calling on MPs to stand up for constituents and extend the tax relief to natural gas. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe went as far as declaring he would \u201cabsolutely not\u201d collect carbon tax on natural gas starting on January 1, 2024 \u2013 and then passed legislation to that effect.<\/p>\n<p>Provincial finance ministers gathered and five of them issued a joint statement to say that Trudeau\u2019s pause of the carbon tax on home heating oil created \u201cjurisdictional imbalances\u201d and they urged him to \u201celiminate the carbon tax to ensure fairness and ease financial pressure on Canadians.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As this was transpiring, Seamus O\u2019Regan, Newfoundland MP and Labour Minister mused for the Ottawa press corps that the Liberal cabinet was intent to \u201cbarrel on\u201d because, as O\u2019Regan put it, \u201cIt\u2019s hard breaking through regular everyday folks who are just having trouble making things meet and are looking for someone to blame.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Gudie Hutchings, Newfoundland MP and the Minister of Rural Economic Development (for all of Canada) also took to the airwaves to poke at the western premiers, stating on a CTV News show, \u201cAtlantic caucus was vocal with what they\u2019ve heard from their constituents and perhaps they need to elect more Liberals in the Prairies so we can have that conversation as well.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Premier Moe instantly shot back, \u201cHow is that fair?\u2026 Now a federal minister has said if people out West want a carbon tax exemption we should elect more Liberals. This is no way to run a country. As Premier I cannot accept the federal government giving an affordability break to people in one part of Canada but not here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Premiers\u2019 appeal fell on deaf ears in Ottawa. PM Trudeau was emphatic in stating no expansion to the tax exemption for other types of home heating, \u201cThere will absolutely not be any other carve-outs or suspension of the price on pollution.\u201d Dan Vandal, Manitoba MP and Northern Affairs Minister was sent into a media scrum to echo the PM\u2019s message: \u201cListen, the door is closed on carve-outs as far as I\u2019m concerned. This is a policy to get rid of home heating oil and replace it with heat pumps because it\u2019s environmentally much better.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In assessing this Liberal-made divisive turf war, consider these facts:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A recent federal government report reveals a majority of Canadian homeowners (53 per cent) now spend more than $200 a month on heat and light, and one in five (21 per cent) state \u201cmy home energy costs are a significant financial burden.\u201d Also, 26 per cent of homeowners report their monthly expenses including bills, mortgage, debt payments and loans exceeded 60 per cent of their monthly household income.<\/li>\n<li>Almost three in five (57 per cent) of Canadians surveyed in a recent Leger poll want relief from carbon pricing on all home heating. Support for removing carbon pricing from home heating was seen in every region of the country: Atlantic Canada (66 per cent), Quebec (50 per cent), Ontario (54 per cent), Prairies (60 per cent), and BC (64 per cent).<\/li>\n<li>Further to minister Vandal\u2019s point of argument above, the federal government reports that its subsidy program to replace housing heating oil with heat pumps, which began in early 2023, has only seen a total of 43 heat pumps installed. There are approximately 1.1 million residences in Canada using home heating oil.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>On Monday, it appeared that the dispute was put to bed when a Conservative motion to extend the carbon tax exemption on all types of home heating for \u201call Canadians\u201d was voted on and defeated 186-135, with Bloc Quebecois MPs voting along with the Liberals. An increasingly agitated Saskatchewan Premier Moe observed of the vote \u201c\u2026 supported by the Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois \u2013 a party that wants to break up Canada. That explains a lot about the state of our country under Trudeau.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Then mid-week there came a new twist to the carbon tax debate when Environment and Sustainable Development Commissioner Jerry DeMarco released a report that concluded the government\u2019s climate plan was a failure. DeMarco forecasted that the country would not meet its 2030 emission reduction target. In real numbers, the report recorded that from 1990 to 2021 Canada\u2019s greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 13.9 per cent, which happens to be the worst performance of any of the G7 nations.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner DeMarco called out the governing Liberals for having failed in recent years to prioritize and implement key environmental policies, as well as relying on too many unrealistic assumptions and projections. He concluded that the government had no cohesive plan, no specified timetables and\u00a0 measurements to meet its targets for reducing carbon emissions.<\/p>\n<p>The Conservatives point out that the only timetable the Liberals have been focused on delivering has been the scheduled increases to its carbon tax. In this way, the carbon tax has become the central policy piece of the Liberals\u2019 carbon emission strategy to achieve its 2030 and 2050 emissions targets.<\/p>\n<p>Found within a Liberal document circulated after the 2019 federal election, PM Trudeau explains their approach in annually hiking the carbon tax: \u201cThe principle is straightforward: a carbon price establishes how much businesses and households need to pay for their pollution. The higher the price, the greater the incentive to pollute less, conserve energy and invest in low-carbon solutions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, as the DeMarco Report indicates, this punitive tax approach has not been effective and emissions have actually risen over the past couple decades. Not only is the Liberals\u2019 carbon tax costing Canadians dearly, it has clearly failed in its stated objective.<\/p>\n<p>For months now Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been crisscrossing the country on an \u201cAxe the Tax\u201d tour with a commitment to rid Canadians of their carbon tax burden. His campaign was inadvertently showcased by the political exchanges of the past two weeks. What began as the PM\u2019s powerplay for Maritime votes, further divided the country and, in the end, exposed the shoddiness of the Liberal government\u2019s climate change plans and its oppressive, ineffectual carbon tax.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Chris George<\/em><\/strong><em>\u00a0is an Ottawa-based government affairs advisor and wordsmith, president of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cgacommunications.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CG&amp;A COMMUNICATIONS<\/a>. Contact:\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:ChrisG.George@gmail.com\">ChrisG.George@gmail.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>LINK: <a href=\"https:\/\/niagaraindependent.ca\/liberals-carbon-tax-is-an-oppressive-ineffectual-tax\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/niagaraindependent.ca\/liberals-carbon-tax-is-an-oppressive-ineffectual-tax\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Niagara Independent, November 10, 2023 \u2013 If anything, the events of the past two weeks have revealed the Liberals\u2019 carbon tax is a political ploy and not a tool to fight climate change as they claim it is. The carbon tax is simply another tax on Canadians, not \u201ca price on pollution.\u201d And this&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85],"tags":[76],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15730"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15730"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15732,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15730\/revisions\/15732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bygeorgejournal.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}